Austin,Texas

Discussion in 'Austin FC' started by G Enriquez, Feb 27, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Eleven Bravo

    Eleven Bravo Member+

    Atlanta United
    United States
    Jul 3, 2004
    SC
    Club:
    Atlanta Silverbacks
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    My lingering question, if not already addressed, if Austin gets Precourt’s crew, and Columbus keeps the crew...what happens to the players? Do they go to Austin or are they with the new Crew?
     
  2. POdinCowtown

    POdinCowtown Member+

    Jan 15, 2002
    Columbus
    The current Crew team and players will stay in Columbus and play there in 2019. Once Precourt has a deal done in Austin and gets his stadium built, they will get an expansion team. MLS is calling the Columbus team the expansion team for their own reasons but the players, history, colors, etc are staying up here.
     
    TyphonInc, Tobias C and Eleven Bravo repped this.
  3. Sport Billy

    Sport Billy Member+

    May 25, 2006
    Correct, it would be a transfer of the Crew to the Browns' owner and Precourt getting an expansion team in Austin.
     
  4. Eleven Bravo

    Eleven Bravo Member+

    Atlanta United
    United States
    Jul 3, 2004
    SC
    Club:
    Atlanta Silverbacks
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    So, to make sure I followed you correctly, “they” is referred to as Austin, and they will simply be a brand new ownership/club whereas the new Crew owner will take over the current Crew situation after 2019?
     
  5. TheRealBilbo

    TheRealBilbo Member+

    Apr 5, 2016
    Applying the duck test (if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck)....

    The team in Austin will be an expansion team owned by Precourt, the current owner of the Crew. The team in Columbus will be the current Crew owned by the owner of the Cleveland Browns and a local real estate guy.

    The contracts signed by people to carry out the transaction will show Precourt moving his team to Austin, and the team in Columbus will be an expansion team, but don't let that fool you.
     
    LainfordExpress and Tobias C repped this.
  6. antnee7898

    antnee7898 Member

    Oct 19, 2007
    South Houston, TX
    Club:
    Houston Dynamo
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Right. So does this mean the Browns owned new Crew pays the expansion fee and Precourt doesn't?
     
  7. MjrGrubert

    MjrGrubert BigSoccer Supporter

    May 22, 2003
    Whitefish, MT
    Club:
    FC Dallas
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Actually a possible way for the MLS to play in Austin prior to the McKalla site being finished is to just expand the Austin Bold stadium at COTA. They build up and take down seating (owned? or rented?) for the F1 every year which seats say 30k+ so maybe its doable if the actual site location can handle the additional capacity.
    Of course Epstein is fighting the Austin MLS at the moment but maybe they work things out if they ever get to the point where the move is totally finalized and moving ahead.
     
  8. Eleven Bravo

    Eleven Bravo Member+

    Atlanta United
    United States
    Jul 3, 2004
    SC
    Club:
    Atlanta Silverbacks
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    On another note, I sort of hope that both clubs are a huge success and also develop a passionate rivalry with each other. I find it sort of disappointing that Houston-SJ don’t have a better rivalry.
     
  9. antnee7898

    antnee7898 Member

    Oct 19, 2007
    South Houston, TX
    Club:
    Houston Dynamo
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    It was at first when we had the SJ players actually (Ching,Onstad,etc.) Then after a while it just died down not having much more of a history with them. Competition creates rivalry with teams far from home like Hou-KC had because of playoffs. We just haven't gotten that from SJ, and SJ hasn't gotten that from Hou.

    Personally, and especially the way things panned out, I think a rivalry between Austin and Columbus won't last that long. 5-6 years at best, probably not even that long, just my opinion.
     
    LainfordExpress and Eleven Bravo repped this.
  10. jaykoz3

    jaykoz3 Member+

    Dec 25, 2010
    Conshohocken, PA
    Club:
    Philadelphia Union
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Tobias C repped this.
  11. stanger

    stanger BigSoccer Supporter

    Nov 29, 2008
    Columbus
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    How are things going in Austin? Has Precourt been there at all? Now that the fans all know there will not be a team until 2021 at the earliest, if ever, what's the mood?
     
  12. TyphonInc

    TyphonInc Member+

    Columbus Crew
    United States
    Jul 3, 2018
    Dublin, OH
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I do believe our resident Soccer Lawyer @soundermiki would disagree with your opinion. It's not a conspiracy, the mayor and 2 council members received significant amount of money form Precourt Sports Ventures.

    From his article: https://socceresq.com/2018/08/09/handicapping-the-mls2atx-vote-tonight/

    Steve Adler - Contributions from PSV: Yes, to the tune of over $10,000.
    Sabino Renteria - Contributions from PSV: Yes, in the amount of about $6,125
    Kathie Tovo - Contributions from PSV: Oh yes, Tovo received about $7,100
    Ann Kitchen - Contributions from PSV: A nominal amount ($50).
     
  13. MjrGrubert

    MjrGrubert BigSoccer Supporter

    May 22, 2003
    Whitefish, MT
    Club:
    FC Dallas
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    #688 MjrGrubert, Nov 16, 2018
    Last edited: Nov 16, 2018
    No problem. Guess we agree to disagree. To think that chump change would swing a vote from no to yes is fanciful imo.
    Yes the ACC will be immortalized with a plaque somewhere on site and they will be introduced on the field etc when and if it opens.
     
  14. Draghignazzo

    Draghignazzo Member+

    Feb 24, 2007
    Columbus
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    [​IMG]

    "Hey buddy...spare any chump change?"
     
  15. Adrian

    Adrian Member

    Columbus Crew
    England
    May 9, 1999
    Plain City, OH, USA
    Nat'l Team:
    England
    Obviously PSV thought it would make a difference.
     
    LainfordExpress and TyphonInc repped this.
  16. stanger

    stanger BigSoccer Supporter

    Nov 29, 2008
    Columbus
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    When do you think that will be? Think your kids kids will see it?
     
    LainfordExpress repped this.
  17. stanger

    stanger BigSoccer Supporter

    Nov 29, 2008
    Columbus
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    When do you think that will be? Think your kids kids will see it?
     
  18. TyphonInc

    TyphonInc Member+

    Columbus Crew
    United States
    Jul 3, 2018
    Dublin, OH
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Welcome to the "Post Truth Generation" where we only spout items that match our agenda, and if there is any evidence to the contrary we just discard it.
     
  19. MjrGrubert

    MjrGrubert BigSoccer Supporter

    May 22, 2003
    Whitefish, MT
    Club:
    FC Dallas
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    #694 MjrGrubert, Nov 16, 2018
    Last edited: Nov 16, 2018
    Yep people espousing wild ass statements as Truth without any evidence about campaign contributions that greased the ACC approval to forward some agenda in particular. Give it rest its boring. :cool:
     
  20. MjrGrubert

    MjrGrubert BigSoccer Supporter

    May 22, 2003
    Whitefish, MT
    Club:
    FC Dallas
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  21. stanger

    stanger BigSoccer Supporter

    Nov 29, 2008
    Columbus
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  22. MjrGrubert

    MjrGrubert BigSoccer Supporter

    May 22, 2003
    Whitefish, MT
    Club:
    FC Dallas
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Well its pretty simplistic (and I could easily of missed some key components) and likely the difference will narrow once more information on both deals are disclosed but the quick overview is $20m (McKalla land value) vs $100m. Big assumption is that both deals will be owned by city/county entities so no team pays property taxes going forward so that is a wash.
     
  23. stanger

    stanger BigSoccer Supporter

    Nov 29, 2008
    Columbus
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I haven’t seen the new stadium in Columbus will be publicly owned.

    And there is so much more wrong in Austin with their “deal” that makes the Columbus situation apples to oranges.
     
  24. POdinCowtown

    POdinCowtown Member+

    Jan 15, 2002
    Columbus
    There was always an asymmetry in that Precourt offered to build a privately financed stadium in Austin but not Columbus. Meanwhile Columbus offered public support to a new soccer stadium if the team were owned by someone other than Precourt.

    If we're really aiming for a $250 mil stadium, then we'll have probably the nicest stadium in the country for a soccer team, topping LAFC, SKC, and RBNJ. It will top whatever Austin builds but is probably aimed at simply outdoing FCC.

    Crew fans are certainly getting the better end of the stick. They get a new stadium with new ownership led by Edwards. Austin also gets a new stadium but with parking issues and ownership led by Precourt.
     
  25. MjrGrubert

    MjrGrubert BigSoccer Supporter

    May 22, 2003
    Whitefish, MT
    Club:
    FC Dallas
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Plus a better downtown location so I agree 100%. Parking concerns are overblown imo though.
     

Share This Page